Connect with us

Editorials

TEACHER SEEKS PUPIL. Must have an earnest desire to save the world. Apply in person. (From Daniel Quinn’s Ishmael”)

Published

on

“With mankind gone, how will Gorilla Survive?” –From Daniel Quinn’s “Ishmael”  (Or How we can save the world from Ourselves?”)

The overwhelming amount of daily opinion acting as news and media overload has caused this journalist and Publisher as well as millions of us to seek shelter in Nature.  When one looks at the natural world, we see an ecosystem that works on its own, in balance, in harmony. A bee doesn't need Google to know what to do, a natural metamorphosis and Homeostasis just happens naturally, and birds generally know when danger is near.  One of the biggest flaws in humanity is the notion that "We are here to run this place."

While the United Nations 17 Sustainable Goals have been shared by academics and parliamentarians as well as leaders of various governmental sectors, our flawed and over-compromised communications systems keep most of the public  in the dark of what the public can do to contribute to a healthier world, a world in balance with our Planet. Instead of living in balance and in harmony, we live in dysfunction, disease and constant war. A Society cannot truly thrive when we’re in a constant state of ignorance.

To clearly articulate the possibilities for citizen consumption, we are featuring a few of the many important excerpts from a White Paper by Regina Lamour which is titled: “Sixth wave of innovation, Forth Industrial Revolution and Energy Breakthroughs as levers of Paradigm shift.”

What is influencing our path?
The challenges in this century are enormous and the solutions to address them must be outperforming. The damages caused by the aging industrial capitalism are already threatening all future perspectives. At the same time, the major global mega-trends are adding the pressure on natural systems and humans and will be of a greater importance in the next decades. They are global forces such as Shift in Global Economic Power, Demographic Change, Rapid Urbanization, Raise of Technology, Climate Change and Resource Scarcity (PwC, 2016).

And their implications could have profound effects on the events in the 21st century as well as defense and security environment in which nations operate.

Additionally, we are living in an extremely important moment of our history. In the context of increasing systemic complexity, multiple simultaneous stresses and unprecedented challenges, we are in urgent need to address the aggregated global problems as rapidly and efficiently as possible.


We don’t need another smart phone. We need a smarter conversation.  Mobilized is building an empowering constructive solutions-based journalism network from the ground up. While most news is the story of disease and dysfunction, we believe that media can empower, inspire, inform, educate and enable healthier outcomes for us all.

We  are collaborators in creation of better together. 

Stay inspired and Discover how you can get involved with your vision and mission with the Mobilized Network!


 

The 6 th wave of innovation is the new development cycle which will demonstrate how our world is going to look like in this century: will it break-through or will it break-down? Most probably, both will happen synchronously depending on the capacity of different regions to respond to global challenges. The 4 th industrial revolution is the technological progress which is already shaping this new wave, and the choice of the energy technologies to power the next cycle will be determinant for its success.

The climate on our planet is changing faster than predicted. Many official sources announce, that we are heading towards the unprecedented warming scenarios, very likely between +3- 6C°, already by the end of this century. And the speed of change can be explained by the increase in the GHG emissions and little considered earlier factors, such as permafrost fawning and rapid Arctic melting, both extremely powerful catalysts of warming. Moreover, with every additional 1°C, the uncertainty of climate system behaviour will grow. As a result, we have little time left to breakthrough in the 6 th wave, and we increase the probability of costly negative events, such as abrupt climate shifts, economic and social breakdowns, sever
resource-based conflicts, etc., especially, if temperatures continue to raise.

Finally, there is no doubt that science is capable to deliver revolutionary solutions and there is a growing need for cheaper and better energy technologies to respond to the global energy demand which is outpacing the population growth nowadays. Even though, we gain in the
energy efficiency to reduce our energy consumption, the global demand will remain too high to be satisfied without harming the environment.

So, it is perfect time to discuss about the energy breakthroughs at political level and define the criteria of future energy technologies capable to support the UN Millennium development goals, such as the end of the energy poverty on our planet, in a sustainable manner.

Besides, there is the raising voice of younger generations more concerned about the situation and capable to see the importance of new solutions for the future, so, together we can play the pivotal role in the transition to turn the 6th wave of innovation into “Green Kondratieff”, and the 4 th industrial revolution into the “Era of Breakthroughs”. All the efforts to follow this direction will result in a better resilience of regions, towns, villages, organisations, families, a better adaptiveness to many inevitable costly risks and stronger social cohesion which is the main condition to maintain in life the dynamic of transformations and cross the turbulence zone, where we are right now, faster and with less losses.

 

The following vision is built on the Energy Innovation Act designed by the New Energy Movement (US), who is addressing these questions in a systemic way. In current circumstances, the energy breakthroughs are the fastest way to help our civilisation to end all conflicts, poverty and pollution. The potential returns as measured by positive impacts to national security, energy security, human health, the environment, and economics are enormous and incalculable (Breakthrough Power, Garbon, Manning).

SDG 1 and 2: No poverty. Zero hunger.
The energy breakthroughs can supply cheaper and cleaner electricity, heat or cooling, so global standard of living will be greatly improving everywhere. Hunger will disappear as food can be grown with less impact on the environment on restored lands.

SDG 3: Good health and well-being
Clean air is an important component of our health and well-being. Various forms of toxic pollution from combustion of fossil fuels become a historical footnote. The remediation can be achieved through elimination of air pollution via rapid electrification and the implementation of the energy technologies of the next generation across carbon-intensive industries.

SDG 4 and 5: Quality education. Gender equality
Education rates continue to improve throughout the developing world. The interest for new technologies to leapfrog into the forth industrial revolution is now real. Human population stabilizes, women are more active and are playing key role in resources preservation. A tremendous wave of human creativity is unleashed to design a cleaner energy infrastructure and better economic model. The societal progress is accelerated by the global culture of sharing and cooperation.

SDG 6: Clean water and sanitation
Water can be finally supplied to communities anywhere on the Earth with help of new technologies extracting it from the air or sea and repeatedly recycling it using low cost energy. The carbon footprint of desalination industry can be dramatically reduced if powered by the
energy breakthroughs.

SDG 7: Affordable and clean energy
New energy technologies are the strongest levers to transform the global economy from inside-out. Cessation of environmentally-damaging power generation projects means more small and medium scale infrastructure installations, better security, flexibility and freedom to consumers, turning them into smart and responsible prosumers. Expensive, dangerous, landscape altering power transmission lines become obsolete. The era of technologies such as nuclear is no longer among the solutions to halt the climate change and the energy crises. New energy technologies are receiving larger support and recognition.

SDG 8: Decent work and economic growth
The global economy is entering the 6 th wave of the innovation with higher confidence as soon as the economic growth is powered by clean energy technologies which allow to decouple it from the emissions and plug the global economy into new infrastructure. The advanced energy transition is creating even more jobs.

SDG 9, 11 and 12: Industry, innovation, infrastructure. Sustainable cities and communities.
Responsible consumption and production. Greatly increased recycling of wastes made possible by very low cost energy, further reducing the need for environmentally-damaging resource extraction. Great reduction in environmentally-damaging resource extraction and transportation of fossil and nuclear fuels.

SDG 13: Climate action
The energy breakthroughs are the shortest way to achieve the Paris Agreement goals and  reduce the scale of dangerous risks of the global warming. If the R&D in the energy sector is backed up by substantial investments, many technologies will reach the market already in the next decades and allow to cut the emissions by 90% before 2050.

SDG 14 and 15: Life below water. Life on land.
The reparative measures of water and soil by very low-cost energy become possible. Enlightened civilization is choosing a bold new direction of clean cheap power without depleting anything, as people got involved in deciding what energy technologies to support.

SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
The role of institutions is even more important to maintain the balance between different economic, political and military forces. The cost of conflicts and geopolitical tensions related to dwindling fossil fuel supplies and other natural resources, resulting in greatly enhanced national security, reduced U.S. military expenditures, and reduced risk to military personnel and civilians.

SDG 17: Partnership for the Goals
Science is more present in the negotiations what makes political decisions more relevant and there is a closer collaborative work among the best world experts in a variety of specific areas, such as climate, bio-diversity, the energy technology category. It is even more important to see the big picture, the high stakes for our civilisation that are involved in our current choices. It is perfect time to learn together how to turn problems into solutions.

The future is in OUR Hands.

Get Mobilized and Make Love Go Viral!

Editorials

As the Golden Globes lose their luster, can we create a better version of Hollywood?

Published

on

 

Something interesting is happening in Hollywood. People are walking away from the Golden Globe Awards.

And for good reason.

Anyone who has ever worked in the filthy abyss of Hollywood, New York, or any major entertainment city will know first hand how these systems work. Sycophants, parasites and moguls and talent agents willing to step all over each other just for the sake of another prize. Some will even kill for a shot at the brass ring.  And industry divided cannot succeed.

The only good thing I found in the Golden Globes was watching Ricky Gervais lampoon the stars and their handlers from the stage. Bravo to Gervais, it doesn’t make a difference what you think of him, afterall, he had something that most of Hollywood doesn’t have. Balls. Guts. And a way of delivering amusing reality dosed insults to their face only to find he’s been re-instated as the show host for the next years showing.

 

The annual Golden Globes ceremony has been unable to find a broadcasting partner or any celebrities willing to present or collect its awards after a Hollywood boycott over its diversity and ethics scandal, resulting in a pared-down event with the emphasis on philanthropy.

According to Variety, the Globes’ talent bookers have failed to persuade any big Hollywood figures to attend the 2022 edition of the awards ceremony, a hitherto glittering annual event that traditionally kicked off the lucrative awards season. In March 2021 more than 100 public relations firms announced they would withdraw cooperation with the Globes, a series of high-profile Hollywood figures, including Tom Cruise and Scarlett Johansson, made stinging public criticisms, and TV network NBC cancelled its broadcast of the 2022 edition. (-The Guardian)

 
eguardian.com/film/2022/jan/09/golden-globes-lose-their-shine-as-a-listers-shun-unethical-ceremony

But this years showing not only lacked the luster of Hollywood today, but doesn’t even have a Network or Livestream to cover it.  I guess we’ll have to rely on celeb Twitter Feeds.

Get Mobilized and Make Love Go Viral!
Continue Reading

Arts

How The Pentagon and CIA Have Shaped Thousands of Hollywood Movies into Super Effective Propaganda

Published

on

By David Swanson, World BEYOND War, January 5, 2022

Propaganda is most impactful when people don’t think it’s propaganda, and most decisive when it’s censorship you never knew happened.

 

When we imagine that the U.S. military only occasionally and slightly influences U.S. movies, we are extremely badly deceived. The actual impact is on thousands of movies made, and thousands of others never made. And television shows of every variety.

The military guests and celebrations of the U.S. military on game shows and cooking shows are no more spontaneous or civilian in origin than the ceremonies glorifying members of the U.S. military at professional sports games — ceremonies that have been paid for and choreographed by U.S. tax dollars and the U.S. military. The “entertainment” content carefully shaped by the “entertainment” offices of the Pentagon and the CIA doesn’t just insidiously prepare people to react differently to news about war and peace in the world. To a huge extent it substitutes a different reality for people who learn very little actual news about the world at all.

The U.S. military knows that few people watch boring and non-credible news programs, much less read boring and non-credible newspapers, but that great masses will eagerly watch long movies and TV shows without too much worrying about whether anything makes sense. We know that the Pentagon knows this, and what military officials scheme and plot as a result of knowing this, because of the work of relentless researchers making use of the Freedom of Information Act. These researchers have obtained many thousands of pages of memos, notes, and script re-writes. I don’t know whether they’ve put all of these documents online — I certainly hope they do and that they make the link widely available. I wish such a link were in giant font at the end of a fantastic new film. The film is called Theaters of War: How the Pentagon and CIA Took Hollywood. The Director, Editor, and Narrator is Roger Stahl. The Co-Producers are Matthew Alford, Tom Secker, Sebastian Kaempf. They’ve provided an important public service.

In the film we see copies of and hear quotations from and analysis of much of what has been uncovered, and learn that thousands of pages exist that nobody has yet seen because the military has refused to produce them. Film producers sign contracts with the U.S. military or CIA. They agree to “weave in key talking points.” While unknown quantities of this sort of thing remain unknown, we do know that nearly 3,000 films and many thousands of TV episodes have been given the Pentagon treatment, and many others have been handled by the CIA. In many film productions, the military effectively becomes a co-producer with veto power, in exchange for allowing the use of military bases, weapons, experts, and troops. The alternative is the denial of those things.

But the military is not as passive as this might suggest. It actively pitches new story ideas to movie and TV producers. It seeks out new ideas and new collaborators who might bring them to a theater or laptop near you. Act of Valor actually began life as a recruitment advertisement.

Of course, many movies are made without military assistance. Many of the best never wanted it. Many that wanted it and were denied, managed to get made anyway, sometimes at much greater expense without the U.S. tax dollars paying for the props. But a huge number of movies are made with the military. Sometimes the initial movie in a series is made with the military, and the remaining episodes voluntarily follow the military’s line. Practices are normalized. The military sees huge value in this work, including for recruitment purposes.

The alliance between the military and Hollywood is the main reason that we have lots of big blockbuster movies on certain topics and few if any on others. Studios have written scripts and hired top actors for movies on things like Iran-Contra that have never seen the light of day because of a Pentagon rejection. So, nobody watches Iran-Contra movies for fun the way they might watch a Watergate movie for fun. So, very few people have any notions about Iran-Contra.

But with the reality of what the U.S. military does being so awful, what, you might wonder, are the good topics that do get lots of movies made about them? A lot are fantasy or distortion. Black Hawk Down turned reality (and a book it was “based on”) on its head, as did Clear and Present Danger. Some, like Argo, hunt for small stories within large ones. Scripts explicitly tell audiences that it doesn’t matter who started a war for what, that the only thing that matters is the heroism of troops trying to survive or to rescue a soldier.

Yet, actual U.S. military veterans are often shut out and not consulted They often find movies rejected by the Pentagon as “unrealistic” to be very realistic, and those created with Pentagon collaboration to be highly unrealistic. Of course, a huge number of military-influenced films are made about the U.S. military fighting space aliens and magical creatures — not, clearly, because it’s believable but because it avoids reality. On the other hand, other military-influenced films shape people’s views of targeted nations and dehumanize the humans living in certain places.

Don’t Look Up is not mentioned in Theaters of War, and presumably had no military involvement (who knows?, certainly not the movie-watching public), yet it uses a standard military-culture idea (the need to blow up something coming from outerspace, which in reality the U.S. government would simply love to do and you could hardly stop them) as an analogy for the need to stop destroying the planet’s climate (which you cannot easily get the U.S. government to remotely consider) and not one reviewer notices that the film is an equally good or bad analogy for the need to stop building nuclear weapons — because U.S. culture has had that need effectively excised.

The military has written policies on what it approves and disapproves. It disapproves depictions of failures and crimes, which eliminates much of reality. It rejects films about veteran suicide, racism in the military, sexual harassment and assault in the military. But it pretends to refuse to collaborate on films because they’re not “realistic.”

Yet, if you watch enough of what is produced with military involvement you’ll imagine that using and surviving nuclear war is perfectly plausible. This goes back to the original Pentagon-Hollywood invention of myths about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and runs right up through military influence on The Day After, not to mention the transformation — paid for by people who throw a fit if their tax dollars help prevent someone freezing on the street — of Godzilla from a nuclear warning to the reverse. In the original script for the first Iron Man movie, the hero went up against the evil weapons dealers. The U.S. military rewrote it so that he was a heroic weapons dealer who explicitly argued for more military funding. Sequels stuck with that theme. The U.S. military advertised its weapons of choice in Hulk, Superman, Fast and Furious, and Transformers, the U.S. public effectively paying to push itself to support paying thousands of times more — for weapons it would otherwise have no interest in.

“Documentaries” on the Discovery, History, and National Geographic channels are military-made commercials for weapons. “Inside Combat Rescue” on National Geographic is recruitment propaganda. Captain Marvel exists to sell the Air Force to women. Actress Jennifer Garner has made recruitment ads to accompany movies she’s made that are themselves more effective recruitment ads. A movie called The Recruit was largely written by the head of the CIA’s entertainment office. Shows like NCIS push out the military’s line. But so do shows you wouldn’t expect: “reality” TV shows, game shows, talk shows (with endless reunifications of family members), cooking shows, competition shows, etc.

I’ve written before about how Eye in the Sky was openly and proudly both completely unrealistic nonsense and influenced by the U.S. military to shape people’s ideas about drone murders. A lot of people have some small idea of what goes on. But Theaters of War: How the Pentagon and CIA Took Hollywood helps us to grasp the scale of it. And once we’ve done that, we may gain some possible insights into why polling finds much of the world fearing the U.S. military as a threat to peace, but much of the U.S. public believing that U.S. wars benefit people who are grateful for them. We may begin to form some guesses as to how it is that people in the United States tolerate and even glorify endless mass-killing and destruction, support threatening to use or even using nuclear weapons, and suppose the U.S. to have major enemies out there threatening its “freedoms.” Viewers of Theaters of War may not all immediately react with “Holy shit! The world must think we’re lunatics!” But a few may ask themselves whether it’s possible that wars don’t look like they do in movies — and that would be a great start.

Theaters of War ends with a recommendation, that movies be required to disclose at the start any military or CIA collaboration. The film also notes that the United States has laws against propagandizing the U.S. public, which might make such a disclosure a confession of a crime. I would add that since 1976, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights has required that “Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.”

To learn more about this film, view it, or host a screening of it, go here.

Get Mobilized and Make Love Go Viral!
Continue Reading

Editorials

The Grinch That Stole Christmas

Published

on

Back in the mid 70’s as my wife and I were starting our photography business Wally Miller, a successful local businessman, invited us to his office to offer help in the form of business advice. He asked only that we bring a financial statement and of course we complied.  The business startup process was new to us and after two years we were still losing money, and there it was in plain sight on the financial statement.  Wally welcomed us warmly and after a few minutes of careful study of our financials offered this observation, “You have no bad debts.”

Naturally I took this as a compliment.  I was proud that we had no bad debts, but that is not what Wally meant.  He elaborated, “If you have no bad debts that means that your credit is too tight and that translates into lost business.” His meaning was clear.  To be successful, really successful, you have to accept reasonable losses.  It’s the very nature of business.  If you want 100% certainty there can be no risk and without risk there can be no profits.

There’s a lesson in this thinking for Joe “McFuqwad” Manchin, the tight-ass, penny-pinching Grinch ruining Christmas for every American under the cover of “fiscal responsibility.”  His staffers gave us a look into his rationale, revealing two of the real reasons behind Joe’s decision to be the big NO.

Apparently Manchin believes that giving money to the poor in the form of a child tax credit is unwise because in his view, many will spend the extra dollars on drugs.  Likewise he is opposed to paid leave, stating that people will just call in sick and then go off deer hunting.

Now let’s all agree that in a free society, there are good and bad actors.  No law can legislate what is in the hearts of men.  No law can dictate integrity or honor.  If that were the case, there would be no GOP, no Jim Jordan, no Ted Cruz, no Matt Gaetz, No Marjorie Taylor Green, no Lauren Boebert. You get my drift, but I digress.

Once you agree to recognize that the actions of individuals are beyond your control, you must the adjust your decisions and subsequent actions to affect the greatest good for the majority.  Charity benefits the worthy and unworthy alike, without discrimination.  To withhold benefits from the worthy because there will always be unworthy recipients is to succumb to the devil’s play, a game of reduction that punishes all for the few.

Get Mobilized and Make Love Go Viral!
Continue Reading

Translate:

We are One

Mobilized TV

Mobilized TV on Free Speech TV  takes a deep look at our world, the consequences of human activity on our planet, and how we can reverse and prevent existing and future crises from occurring. Mobilized reveals life on our planet as a system of systems which all work together for the optimal health of the whole. The show delves into deep conversations with change-makers so people can clearly take concerted actions.

Produced by Steven Jay and hosted by Jeff Van Treese.

Mobilized’s TV series Mobilized TV  premieres on Free Speech TV on Friday, October 15, 2021. All episodes appear:

Fridays 9:30 PM Eastern (USA/Canada)

Saturdays:  6:30 PM (Eastern USA/Canada)

Sundays:  8:30 AM Eastern (USA/Canada)

January 7, 8, 9, 2022

Leading Environmental Justice Attorney, Thomas Linzey of the Center for Democratic and Environmental Rights is a leading force helping communities implement successful rights of nature laws. Find out how your community could take on big business to serve the health of all.

 

Featured24 hours ago

Truths or Consequences: Failing State or Shining Light?: The USA Role in the Twenty-first Century

Featured24 hours ago

The Undertow: The Corrosion of Corruption: Cleaning up the Chaos with Heidi Cuda

INTERVIEWS5 days ago

The time is NOW to Rethink: James Arbib of Re-Think X

INTERVIEWS5 days ago

Savor This: Allan Savory on Real World Solutions Now

INTERVIEWS5 days ago

Ecologic Economics and Steady State Economies with Brian Czech

INTERVIEWS5 days ago

The unlimited potential of space solar Power with John Mankins

INTERVIEWS5 days ago

Understanding the real transition to clean and renewable energy with Professor Chris Rhodes

INTERVIEWS5 days ago

The Father of the Environmental Justice Movement

INTERVIEWS5 days ago

Sustainable Growth on a Finite Planet is Not Possible

INTERVIEWS5 days ago

Help!!! We’re drowning in a sea of Plastic: A conversation with Dr. Julie Peller

The Web of Life1 week ago

It is time for a better relationship with our beautiful, blue planet.

Editorials1 week ago

As the Golden Globes lose their luster, can we create a better version of Hollywood?

Featured2 weeks ago

How Our Grassroots Energy Projects Are Taking Back Power From Utility Companies

Arts2 weeks ago

How The Pentagon and CIA Have Shaped Thousands of Hollywood Movies into Super Effective Propaganda

Food3 weeks ago

How Climate Change Narratives are Used Against Us

Editorials4 weeks ago

The Grinch That Stole Christmas

Editorials4 weeks ago

bell hooks on feminism, race, violence and dealing with rage

Food1 month ago

Moving beyond the Moo– A Post Cow World

A web of Life for ALL Life1 month ago

The Case for Rights of Nature in Practice

A web of Life for ALL Life1 month ago

We are One

Mobilized TV2 months ago

How we can eradicate heart Disease

Mobilized TV2 months ago

Howard Bloom: Imagination Takes You Everywhere

Featured2 months ago

From Punk to Planet: Slam Dunk the Junk with Dave Street

Uncapped2 months ago

The Hoodless Hoodie and No-Wax Floors

Editorials2 months ago

The Decisive Role of Conscience: Clues for Non Violence

Asia2 months ago

The Love for All Animals

Featured2 months ago

Community and World Health: Protecting Native Seeds

An Empowered World2 months ago

In Chile, A different and courageous alternative with new ideas and proposals for leadership

Editorials2 months ago

Celebrating Food Sovereignty | Highlights of Solidarity Actions in October

Editorials2 months ago

Food Sovereignty, a Manifesto for the Future of Our Planet | La Via Campesina

Editorials2 months ago

Good Needs Better Distribution: We Already Have the Tools We Need to Solve Climate Change

Chuck W.2 months ago

The United Nations system: What’s Gone Wrong? What’s Gone Right?

Mobilized TV2 months ago

A Moral Responsibility: Jean Su, Ctr. for Biological Diversity

Editorials2 months ago

OPINION COLUMN: No presidential program raises paradigm shift in education

Mobilized TV3 months ago

On Free Speech TV: Rethinking Humanity with James Arbib of RethinkX

International3 months ago

Anti-mining resistance repressed in El Estor

International3 months ago

Coronacrisis, neoliberalism, democracy: what’s next

Asia3 months ago

Bangladesh PM Sheikh Hasina’s recent meeting with Pakistani envoy has a message for India

Mobilized TV3 months ago

Sustainable Architecture, Design and Building for a Sustainable Planet

Mobilized TV3 months ago

A better understanding of lawn care for Climate Care featuring Dr. Rob Moir of the Ocean River Institute

Mobilized TV3 months ago

Stories from the Reservation: Davidica Little Spotted Horse

Editorials3 months ago

Understanding the global neglect of indigenous peoples

Editorials3 months ago

Diabetes And Net Zero

Editorials3 months ago

Land Workers of the World Unite: Food Sovereignty for Climate Justice Now!

Featured3 months ago

A Primer on Climate Security

Editorials3 months ago

A Finger In The Dam

Mobilized TV3 months ago

Free Speech TV: Episode 001: Davidica Little Spotted Horse

Editorials3 months ago

The Green Jobs Advantage: How Climate-friendly Investments Are Better Job Creators

Editorials3 months ago

Behind the Lofty SDGs the Reality is People Don’t Trust Governments to Act

Editorials3 months ago

Rebranding Public Service

Categories

Trending

Translate »
Skip to toolbar