Connect with us

Uncapped

Biden Factor Part Four, The Buttigieg Inoculation

Published

on

Just why is Hurricane Trump hammering the Biden coast with blankets of Twitter rain?  The prevailing media all agree that it’s because he expects Biden will be the candidate he will face in the 2020  election, but I don’t believe that’s his true motive.  I think he’s using reverse psychology. What he REALLY wants is to go up against Biden. He’s itching for another fight with a flawed candidate. After the election of 2018 Trump has a deep-rooted fear of the power of the progressive sway. It’s not a game he knows how to play.  He swings for the cheap seats by keeping the match a popularity contest of personalities and not policies.  By attacking Biden, the perfect foil who currently wages a Trump war without specific policies, Trump furthers the notion that Biden is the political threat he must defeat in 2020 and therefore must be annihilated  with extreme prejudice.  But in so doing he understands that he will be strengthening the resolve of Democrats to fall in line behind Biden as the anti-Trump candidate who might best take him down.  This is a false premise.  Consequently, he will attack Biden as an Obama proxy and expose all his vulnerabilities reducing his anti-Biden campaign to a single nickname, easily remembered and chanted by the lemmings that attend his rallies, “Sleepy Joe.” While riding the ant-Obama hate wave of his deplorable base, he stirs sympathetic Democrats away from the Progressives he cannot control to support Biden in a reactionary defense to his bully onslaught.

 

The trouble with the Democrats is that they have too many really good primary candidates, any one of which would make a great President.  Bernie is outstanding and has a loyal base, but Warren and Harris are both equally well-equipped to take down Trump with solid policies and logical arguments to support them. Klobuchar also makes a lot of sense but Corey Booker, equally persuasive,  outshines her in passion and personality. Beto is a rock star by virtue of taking on Ted Cruz, thought to be an impossible task, only losing with the narrowest of margins, but compared with the other primary candidates in the field is light on policy. My money is on Buttigieg over Beto. 

 

Rising fast from mayoral obscurity he has shown the wisdom to inoculate himself in advance of the Trump onslaught that will inevitably follow and in so doing may be the perfect candidate. Buttigieg is openly gay in a solid marriage and is deeply religious.  Amazingly, he has bridged the divide between the LGBTQ community and the religious right that might upend his candidacy by talking openly about his relationship with his partner and with his God.  By contrast, the moral ground Trump stands on is quicksand. Considering his many dalliances with playmates and porn stars, and his Hollywood Access audio tape,  he will have trouble creating a scandal for a man devoted to his life partner. In the current political environment he will find it self-destructive to create a derogatory gay nickname for Buttigieg without losing a solid block of voters sympathetic to the ideals of commitment in marital relationships, gay or otherwise. And more importantly, Buttigieg is everything Trump is not.  A Harvard graduate and Rhodes scholar, a veteran Navy intelligence officer who served in Afghanistan, as mayor of South Bend he is credited with spurring the economic growth and business development of that community.  While Trump the playboy philanderer dodged military service with a bogus bone spur and scammed banks losing 1.7 billion dollars, he inserted the “too big to fail” philosophy into our culture and shamelessly lied his way up the ladder using his TV persona to ascend to his current office.

 

The media soft-pedals its Trump assessment by calling him amoral, when by any standard they know he is clearly immoral.  Use of the word “amoral” is safe and appears “objective” while “immoral” is a term that clearly places the user in the anti-Trump camp. No, the media will not state the obvious. Rather, they must look for pundits who will do it for them in order to maintain their “objectivity”  and keep their corporate lawyers happy.

 

Biden has wandered in where angels fear to tread. This is Biden’s attraction, a plain talking Joe fearless in the face of Trump.  While all other Democrat candidates have taken the high ground, preferring to avoid even naming Trump and sticking to policy ideals, Biden attacks Trump full frontal to the cheers of an angry and frustrated electorate running out of patience with the idiotic state of affairs Trump has created and the complicity of the cowardly GOP to work as tireless enablers of such a despicable bullshit artist. While all of America is screaming at their TVs, Biden personifies our anger into a tangible form that has gotten Trump’s attention.  He’s saying what we all want to say to Trump but lack both the clout and the means to deliver it personally.  Trump does not run from a fight and he never shows fear (supposedly) but you can smell it a mile away.  In the words of Bill Maher, “He’s a whiney little bitch!”

Get Mobilized and Make Love Go Viral!
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Editorials

Idjitz Stoopidshitz and-Dumfux

Published

on

Idjitz, Stoopidshitz, and-Dumfux

That’s how the growing resentment against the unvaccinated is best expressed.   Somehow these people regard their decision to flirt with imminent risk as an act of patriotism, the pure expression of American individualism boldly spitting in the wind of governmental control and the face of death itself.

On the eve of the 20th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, we might do well to remember the heroic efforts of the true patriots among us, first responders and committed civil servants, and not the swollen pride of the few who carried the banners of plastic flagstaffs, boldly flapping stars and stripes, on the roll-up windows of their Cadillac Escalades to tailgate parties on the weekends that followed.  Some people can sure talk the talk, and the rest, Hillary’s deplorables, show up at events like that of January 6th.

But to be certain, those patriots on September 11th who went into those collapsing towers were heroes not solely because they put their lives in danger, took a risk to save others, selfless acts in defiance of the most certain of consequences, but because they truly cared about you and me.  All of America was in those towers.

Looking back on the death toll that day, as staggering as it was, it was even more shocking that the event occurred in our sacred homeland, a place of safety where we Americans enjoy our freedoms unhindered by fear.   To secure that same future, we accepted a massive loss of freedoms to embrace the Patriot Act and we shipped thousands of young Americans to distant lands, many to fall at the hands of unseen terrorists’ IEDs while on patrol.

So why is it that with the overwhelming statistics on Covid deaths, rising infections, the many at-capacity hospitals and the lack of safety for our unprotected children, do these anti-vaxers maintain that their so called freedoms take precedent over the safety of the community at large?  These people are not patriots.  They are the worst kind of self-serving cowards!

Get Mobilized and Make Love Go Viral!
Continue Reading

Uncapped

Andrew Cuomo: The Roadmap from Free Love to Me Too.

Published

on

Whether Governor Andrew Cuomo is guilty of predatory sexual behavior has become the new media sensation of this last week. During that time, a single complaint against the governor has multiplied with the speed of a newly discovered Covid variation into six assertions of his past inappropriate behavior.  If the first person to come forward is to be believed as representative of all six, then it must be concluded that the complaints of harassment are all entirely credible.  After the New York Times broke her story, Charlotte Bennett, the first complainant, sat for a televised interview with Norah O’Donnell outlining the details of her allegations.

For his part, Cuomo met the charges head on with a firm denial of any wrongdoing.

It is however, most interesting to note that the Governor did not deny the validity of the details of the specific events outlined by Ms. Bennett.  What appears to be cut and dry is in fact probably too nuanced to make a criminal determination.  Without a doubt Ms. Bennett is telling the truth.  Might it also be possible that Governor Cuomo is also telling the truth and if so, how can that be?  I don’t think his intent was misinterpreted by Ms. Bennett, and I think he was fully conscious of his approach towards her. Nevertheless, wrong as he was,  it is quite possible that he did not comprehend the ethical problem he had created but felt safe within his understanding of the current social context.  Allow me to explain.

Was Ms. Bennett wrong in thinking, “The governor’s trying to sleep with me?”   I think not. Consider the following, “Without explicitly saying it, he implied to me that I was old enough for him and he was lonely.”  Further, Cuomo inquired about her romantic life and asked if a past trauma had affected her romantic relationships. “He asked if I had trouble enjoying being with someone because of my trauma,” adding that he also asked if I was “sensitive to intimacy, and if it was hard to really be with someone physically.”  He pushed for the close, going so far as to ask her if she had ever been intimate with an older man and offering that personally he was comfortable dating younger women saying, “He was fine with anyone over 22.  I’m 25.”  Can his intentions be any clearer?  He was searching for a way in.

Without doubt this is inappropriate and very creepy behavior, but the road to a determination of illegality is fraught with problems.  Such a conversation may not be criminal but it does require a course adjustment.  In a corporate environment Cuomo would be let go.  In politics, resignation is the remedy. But in spite of the unilateral support for Ms. Bennett by every New York State Democratic leader, and calls for his resignation, Cuomo refuses to resign. Why?

In the age of “Me Too” it is instructive to understand what has become of our cultural norms.  The journey to “Me Too” as a cultural norm begins with “The Pill,” a method of oral contraception for women that was introduced in 1960 and rapidly adopted by overburdened mothers, free-wheeling singles and promiscuous teens.  By 1965, it was common that many high-school and junior-high young girls bragged of carrying a packet of the Pill in their purse, hidden from Mom, proof of having achieved adulthood.

Meanwhile, pouring gas on this fire, young pubescent boys were scouring the magazine racks of the local grocery store in search of brown-paper wrapped copies of the latest “Playboy” magazine to fulfill their hormonal urges to practice that ancient ritual readying them fit for the hunt.  At this point, both sides were all-in and poised for action… but how to initiate?

Making the first move can undoubtedly be awkward for a novitiate.  Culturally, that has long been relegated to the male, but very soon the Pill would change all that.  But for the time being, in 1965 young boys had only the movies to guide them regarding how the approach is made.  Books, a technology of a previous generation, were dry and useless in this nuanced art and television was so sanitized as to be entirely bereft of any help.  No, it fell to movies to complete the circuit connecting the genders and to music in the form of contemporary song to stimulate the passions needed to break the logjam (no pun intended.) As flowed music, so followed the culture and by 1967 a new term had re-entered the lexicon, “Free Love.”

In 1967, during the “Summer of Love,” a social phenomenon erupted in San Francisco when over 100,000 young people under the spell of “flower power” converged on Haight-Ashbury in free-flowing, colorful “hippie” attire, melding music, hallucinogenic drugs, anti-war sentiment and the concept of free-love. These “flower children,” most often referred to as “hippies” were by nature united in their suspicion of the government and opposed to the Viet Nam war.  They rejected consumerism and were more often concerned with art and a generalized spiritual self-awareness often realized through the practice of meditation, all of which equated with “Peace.” Simultaneously, as this movement spread throughout California, hippie communes developed.  These communes were the perfect breeding ground as a foothold for free love to become a cultural norm.

At its core, free love demands freedom from state regulation and church-defined personal relationships, a perfect fit with the ideologies found in communes of the day.  Whether emotional or sexual, legitimate relations between consenting adults are off limits to regulatory oversight and commune residents often interacted freely with many short-term partners.

In free love both men and women have the right to enjoy sexual pleasure without social or legal consequences.  For women, this could not have been made possible without the pill.  In essence, the pill severed the connection between love, romance and sex and opened the door to a more transactional practice of engagement that dispensed with the niceties of dinner and flowers, long walks holding hands and that first moment when a young boy tenuously slips his arm around a young girl on the family couch.  Now it was OK for that young girl on her first kiss to reach down and rub his crotch.  No big deal.  They called it petting back then.  Young girls instinctively knew that Free Love was inextricably linked to the same anti-authoritarian ideals pervading the communes out west and popularized in song, and so, grasping their equality (forgive me) by the balls, they exercised their rights in a most overt way.  While this may have been confusing to some young men, it was most certainly welcome.

But the long term consequence of Free Love was the displacement of the nuanced approach to a romantic relationship with a more direct, transactional approach of a sexual one.  Romance. Requires time and energy and is uncertain, fraught with insecurities, sleepless nights and possible rejection.  It’s never quite fully resolved, and requires constant maintenance, always open to future competition.  Sex on the other hand is short and decisive, over in minutes and quite conclusive.  The approach to sex can be as simple as a question.  The answer determines the possibility.  It can be as crude as, “Hey, you wan’na fuck?” or implied, “have you ever been intimate with an older man?  I’m personally comfortable dating younger women.”

If you understand that the fundamental principle in a proper “Me-Too” relationship is consent, then simply asking the question or indirectly implying it might be considered as a hands-off approach by a lonely, clumsy and rather oafish old man whose only social contacts are made through his work.  Without doubt, it’s a move of desperation.  All the good ones were taken long ago, and many of the ones who got out are embittered and angry and far too wise to be managed or controlled.  After years in office the transactional approach might seem innocent to Andrew Cuomo, after all he was only asking questions, seeking consent. Lacking a proper channel for his physical and emotional urges, he went for the “easy marks” the ones at hand, the pretty ones who he engaged his fantasy of a replenished youth.  His mistake was an abuse of power.  He was their boss.  He should have known that he was making them uncomfortable to engage in such a conversation as he had with each of them.  But this oafish old man failed to understand that asking for a kiss from someone who works for you is as much a violation of “Me-Too” codes as taking the kiss without asking.

 

 

 

Get Mobilized and Make Love Go Viral!
Continue Reading

Uncapped

A Lesson From Prince

Published

on

Far be it from me to offer help to the Republican party, but when it comes to Donald Trump we’re all in this together, like it or not.  Trump is the equal opportunity abuser.  His latest…  Trump has sent cease and desist letters to the three campaign-fund raising committees of the party, the RNC, the NRSC and the NRCC, seeking to stop the use of his image and his name in fund raising for the GOP.

Not that Republican leaders have ever demonstrated an astute cognizance of the lessons of history, especially in areas beyond the ideas of Nicolai Machiavelli, and hardly funk music, but let’s just say that when this very problem presented itself to Prince, the young artist outwitted one of the biggest corporate giants in the entertainment industry.

You see, when Warner Brothers and Prince had a parting of the ways over the direction of Prince’s next album, Prince was under an ironclad contract that stated that if he left the label he “could not record under his name or any other name.”  Brutal, huh?  That’s when his true genius rose to the occasion and he invented the much renowned symbol that identified him with his music. For DJs all across the country, he was referred to as the artist formerly known as Prince.

So you see, the simple workaround is to never use the Trump name,  but to refer to him as “Former President,”  “Our beloved 45th President” (theirs not mine), or “Your Commander-in-Chief.” Meanwhile, it has not occurred to the vengeful halfwit that his image and name will be used in Democratic campaigns to rally against everything ugly he represents in the Republican party and he’s powerless to do anything about it.  Freedom of speech still exists, even after his scorched earth attempt to silence the GOP.

Get Mobilized and Make Love Go Viral!
Continue Reading

Translate:

Chuck W.2 days ago

The Interconnected structure of reality

An Empowered World2 days ago

Your front-row seat to the change you wish to create in the world

An Empowered World3 days ago

The Mobilized Exchange: Community Power: Are We finally ready?

An Empowered World3 days ago

Environmentalists, Scientists and Policymakers Converge at Environmental Media Summit Sept. 30

An Empowered World3 days ago

A GPS for Humanity’s Next Adventure

An Empowered World3 days ago

Manifesto and Principles

An Empowered World4 days ago

The World Unites for World Ecologic Forum on December 10

An Empowered World4 days ago

Action Plan for Re-Thinking Humanity

Editorials6 days ago

Mea Culpa

An Empowered World6 days ago

Communities unite for World Ecologic December 10th

Editorials6 days ago

Idjitz Stoopidshitz and-Dumfux

An Empowered World2 weeks ago

Decentralized Production Hub for Humanity’s Next adventure

Editorials2 weeks ago

Rethinking Climate Change Solutions

An Empowered World2 weeks ago

Dive in to the Ecosystem of Opportunity

An Empowered World2 weeks ago

It’s what you want, the way You want It

An Empowered World2 weeks ago

We bring the world to You

An Empowered World2 weeks ago

The Mobilized Exchange

The Web of Life2 weeks ago

Communities Take a Stand for The Rights of Nature

The Web of Life2 weeks ago

Excuse Me, But What is in that “Food” I’m Eating?

The Web of Life2 weeks ago

Healthy Soil for Healthy, Nutritious Food and Healthy Climate

The Web of Life2 weeks ago

A Paradigm Change Starting with Your Lawns

The Web of Life2 weeks ago

Communities Fight Against Polluters and Miners

The Web of Life2 weeks ago

Cooperatives as a Better Community Service

Chuck W.3 weeks ago

Truth or Consequences

A web of Life for ALL Life3 weeks ago

Environmental Summit

A web of Life for ALL Life3 weeks ago

Systemic Change Driven by Moral Awakening Is Our Only Hope

A web of Life for ALL Life3 weeks ago

Fossil Fuel Exit Strategy finds that existing coal, oil and gas production puts the world on course to overshoot Paris climate targets.

Featured4 weeks ago

Sign Up

Featured4 weeks ago

Environment

Featured4 weeks ago

COMMUNITY MEDIA EVENTS

A web of Life for ALL Life4 weeks ago

About Mobilized

A web of Life for ALL Life4 weeks ago

See the opportunity to return to the sacred

A web of Life for ALL Life2 months ago

Climate Change and Earth Overshoot: Is there a better “Green New Deal?”

A web of Life for ALL Life2 months ago

Why Overfishing is killing our oceans and what we can do about it

Create the Future2 months ago

Danny Schechter Inspired millions (including the founders of this network)

A web of Life for ALL Life2 months ago

Rich nations “must consign coal power to history” – UK COP26 president

Oceans and Water2 months ago

Time To Flip the Ocean Script — From Victim to Solution

A web of Life for ALL Life3 months ago

Allan Savory: A holistic management shift is required

A note from the Publisher3 months ago

New Report by National Academy of Sciences (USA): Social Media is Hazardous to Your Health

A web of Life for ALL Life3 months ago

Listen to the Science: The Impacts of Climate on the Health of People and Planet

Agriculture3 months ago

Ecocide must be listed alongside genocide as an international crime

Energy and Transportation3 months ago

A Controversial Nuclear Waste Cleanup Could Put a critical Legal Question Before the U.S. Supreme Court

Agriculture3 months ago

How is The Gates Foundation is driving the world’s food system in the wrong direction.

Energy and Transportation3 months ago

New report details Big Polluters’ next Big Con

Featured3 months ago

The ACCESS ACT Takes a Step Towards a More Interoperable Future

Business3 months ago

Right to Repair Bill Introduced in Congress

A web of Life for ALL Life3 months ago

The Earth is Alive! Here’s how to regenerate the soil

A web of Life for ALL Life3 months ago

Can re-thinking our lawns solve Climate Change?

A web of Life for ALL Life3 months ago

Stop ripping up our future (Mining in Brasil)

A web of Life for ALL Life3 months ago

Learning how Everything Connects is Vital to our Survival

Groups

Trending

Translate »
Skip to toolbar